In fact, St. Paul often lists the types of people who will not inherit (or receive) the kingdom of God, and yet one has cause to wonder – did he mean they would not be allowed, or that they would not be interested? A brief look at this list (1 Cor 6:9-10) of seemingly arbitrary sins can be more easily understood and interpreted when they are distilled to their single common denominator – pursuit of pleasure:
While St. Paul could easily have legalisticaly quoted each of the passages in the Torah stating the laws against such behaviors – addressing their physical manifestation, he takes things a step further and draws the psychological roots of these sins together as being against the culture of the Kingdom. This connection is designed to point the faithful in a direction that is in accord with the rules of the established kingdom – the following opposite roles are therefore acceptable and will inherit the Kingdom:
It’s funny, I tried thinking of terms/labels that one could slap on all of these definitions and I was reminded of the scene in the Wizard of Oz where the wizard claims, “Back where I come from there are people who do nothing all day but good deeds – they are called… erm… ‘Good Deed Doers’ It is ironic that we don’t have a name for these groups. When we think back on our lives, these are the people who transformed us and often changed our lives forever. Hopefully they are the ones who we have closest to us and who we wish to emulate. Since those belonging to that sin catalog are called ‘unrighteous,’ the folks listed above are the ones who St. Paul considers to be ‘the righteous.’ Notice that it has nothing to do with perfect action – it is entirely based on generosity.
Ask any family therapist and they will probably tell you many stories of codependent relationships that were the result of pairing between the first group (St. Paul’s pleasure seekers) and the second group (righteous life givers). At best, they exist in equilibrium but have a difficult time offering much to society and they often find their social networks fragmentary, themselves isolated, and generally someone at some point becomes dreadfully unhappy with the relationship.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License.
© 2006 Jacob Gorny